01 / 14
The project in context
Overview
Negotium Agon is presented as an interschool business competition involving more than 55 schools across India. Raunak's stated role was organising and developing an applied experience built around venture creation, negotiation, auctions, crisis decisions, and commercial deals.
- Interschool business competition
- 55+ schools claimed in the brief
- Organising and development role
02 / 14
The need that shaped the work
Problem
The competition responds to a learning gap between understanding business concepts in theory and making consequential decisions under time, information, and negotiation pressure.
- Applied business learning
- Decision-making
- Collaboration under pressure
03 / 14
The human and strategic stakes
Why the problem matters
Simulations can make strategy, negotiation, and risk tangible. To establish educational value, the portfolio should eventually pair the event design with participant feedback or learning evidence rather than relying on scale alone.
- Practice beyond theory
- Feedback as evidence
- Learning over spectacle
04 / 14
Signals, questions, and learning
Research and observations
No planning research, participant-needs analysis, benchmarking, or post-event feedback was supplied. Add the real inputs that shaped the format and distinguish observation from interpretation.
- Planning research pending
- Participant feedback pending
05 / 14
The response that emerged
Solution
The event is structured as a sequence of practical business experiences: The Venture Mind, Founder's Forge, The Deal Room, business negotiation, startup simulations, auctions, crisis management, investment, and commercial deals.
- The Venture Mind
- Founder's Forge
- The Deal Room
- Negotiation and crisis simulation
06 / 14
Ownership and contribution
Raunak's role
The brief credits Raunak with organising and developing the competition. Add his exact title, remit, team structure, ownership boundaries, and dated contributions so the reader can separate individual work from collective delivery.
- Organiser
- Event developer
- Contribution detail pending
07 / 14
How the work moved forward
Development process
Add the actual sequence from concept and school outreach through scenario design, rules, testing, logistics, delivery, and review. Attach artefacts such as briefs, schedules, rubrics, or anonymised feedback where permission allows.
- Event chronology pending
- Design artefacts pending
- Review record pending
08 / 14
Constraints encountered honestly
Challenges faced
No specific operational or leadership challenge was supplied. Document a real moment of constraint, Raunak's responsibility within it, the response taken, and what changed as a result.
- Specific challenge and response pending
09 / 14
What was prioritised and why
Decisions and trade-offs
Explain actual format choices—for example, realism, accessibility, judging consistency, pacing, or competitive intensity—only after confirming which alternatives the team considered and why.
- Trade-off record pending
- Decision rationale pending
10 / 14
Claims separated from goals
Impact and verified results
The brief states that more than 55 schools across India were involved. This remains labelled as a brief-supplied figure until a school list, registration record, event report, or equivalent evidence is linked; participant and learning outcomes are not yet supplied.
- 55+ schools — evidence pending
- Participant count pending
- Learning outcomes pending
Impact record
Status shown per metric- Schools involvedAwaiting evidence
- 55+schoolsFigure supplied in the brief; mark verified only after a school list, registrations, or event report is attached.
- ParticipantsAwaiting evidence
- Awaiting verificationNo participant total was supplied.
- Business experiencesAwaiting evidence
- Format documentedThe brief lists named experiences, but the final event structure and count need an event document.
11 / 14
The record behind the story
Testimonials or evidence
No school statement, participant quote, event report, photograph, or media item was supplied. Add only approved and attributable material with source links or files.
- School evidence pending
- Participant feedback pending
- Event media pending
School Testimonial
School testimonial
Reserved for an approved, attributable statement from Raunak's school.
Public evidence link not supplied
Media Mention
Media mention
Reserved for a published media item with a working source link.
Public evidence link not supplied
Report
Impact report
Reserved for methodology, reporting period, underlying data, and findings.
Public evidence link not supplied
12 / 14
Reflection after action
Lessons learned
Add Raunak's reflection on designing fair systems, coordinating a team, communicating under pressure, and improving the participant experience. Use one concrete example for each claimed lesson.
- Organiser reflection pending
13 / 14
The next responsible step
Future plans
No next edition or expansion plan was supplied. If the event continues, add only confirmed goals, owners, timing, and measures of learning quality.
- Future edition not confirmed
14 / 14
Supplied material and placeholders
Links and media
Public website, event report, media coverage, photography, and video fields are ready. No link or approved asset has been entered.
- Event link pending
- Report pending
- Media pending
Media record
image placeholder
Add an approved event photograph with date and context.
Awaiting evidencereport placeholder
Add the official event flow or rulebook.
Awaiting evidence